Is HTML5 the natural replacement for Flash? Thus, in 2017, Adobe, Google, Apple and Microsoft decided to put Flash aside for December 31, 2020, the date from which it has stopped obtaining support. In addition, it did not offer compatibility with touch screens, so its use on mobiles and tablets was very limited. High power consumption : Viewing flash content on portable devices required a large battery consumption due to the high resources it needed to function.High demand for resources : in order for its use to be optimal, it required quite high resources from the computer, which otherwise causes the slowdown of other applications and the blocking of web browsers.

Low security : it was a software full of errors and when it was run as a third-party application within the browser, it was the target of hacker attacks.

And is that the use of this technology had some drawbacks such as: As well as websites like YouTube, they began to forget about Flash, and the new iPhone for Mac was not allowed to use it, and in 2015 Chrome abandoned its use. Little by little they gradually focused on what would become its substitute, such as HTML5. However, over time, many companies decided to stop betting on this technology.

With it, we could be able to reproduce animations on our computer such as moving banners, online mini games or interactive videos, which was a great advance for the time.

With this software it was possible to play files in SWF format, created with Adobe Animate CC or Flex or other third-party tools. Flash Player was developed in the mid-1990s by Macromedia and distributed by Adobe Systems.

Adobe flash animation